The Duncan Banner


December 8, 2013

Fiscal impact of state question 766 for counties, schools, and career technology centers

DUNCAN — On November 12, 2012, S.Q. 766 was on a ballot and went to the vote of the people to eliminate tax assessments on intangible personal property. What you might not know is that prior to the vote of S.Q. 766, legislation was already in place to prevent any NEW tax assessments on intangible personal property. At the time S.Q. 766 was being considered, the Oklahoma Tax Commission released a fiscal impact statement which estimated that the governmental entities supported by ad valorem (property tax) revenues would lose $50 million if S.Q. 766 passed. Some examples of intangible property taxes are:

Patents, inventions, formulas, designs, and trade secrets

Licenses, franchise, and contracts

Land leases, mineral interests, and insurance policies

Custom computer software, and trademarks, trade names, and brand names

S.Q. 766 passed because voters decided that it would be best to do away with intangible personal property tax altogether. We now have current information provided by the Oklahoma Tax Commission on the actual financial impact of this vote.

According to the Oklahoma Tax Commission, 90 of the approximately 250 public service companies that now qualify for the tax exemption created by S.Q. 766 took advantage of the tax break this year; at a cost of $60 million to counties, school districts, and career technology centers.

School districts receive 65% of all centrally assessed property taxes. What this means for schools in Oklahoma is that of the $60 million lost, districts will annually lose $30,777,600 of existing revenue. Of the $60 million lost, local taxpayers will annually pay an additional $9,002,400 to the sinking fund of local school districts. This statewide revenue reduction does not impact the amount of money available to the legislature for state appropriations because ad valorem revenue is used to directly support the work of counties, school districts and career technology center.

S.Q. 766 deprived counties, schools, and career technology centers of $60 million this year. One large corporation alone received a $23 million tax break because of S.Q. 766. Given that level of tax savings, the logical expectation is that more and more eligible corporations will take advantage of this new state created tax break. Should more corporations, especially large ones, exercise this particular tax break, it will lead to fewer county generated taxpayer dollars dedicated to support county government, school districts, and career technology centers. Information provided by the Oklahoma Tax Commission suggests that counties, school districts, and career technology centers could be financially impacted in excess of $100 million annually over the next few years.

Anytime, revenue sources for counties, school districts, and career technology centers are diminished, it is cause for concern. The question that school leaders always ask is, “If we do away with a funding source, what will replace it?” I am still waiting on the answer.

Sherry Labyer,

Duncan Superintendent


Text Only
Local News
4-24 Velma Team Roping Kids.jpg

Velma teens Brodie Williams, left, and Tyler Ray took home a team roping victory from the Heart of Oklahoma Youth Rodeo Association.

  • Governor, state Legislature have misplaced priorities

    If the Oklahoma State Legislators and our Governor spent less time interfering in women’s rights to manage their bodies, creating ways to lay more taxes and fees on the middle class in order to generate more tax breaks which benefit only the wealthy while also conceiving methods with which to fill Oklahoma’s for-profit prisons, they would be doing all of us a favor. Instead, why not work to enhance funding for our schools and wage increases for all school employees? While reforming the state’s educational budget, why don’t they approve wage increases for our Oklahoma State Troopers and enlarge their Academy to insure qualified individuals are ready to fill the upcoming vacancies as many of the older force retire?

    April 9, 2014

  • Self government key to keeping politicians in check

    Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that federal campaign laws that limit the total amount of money donors can give to political parties, committees and candidates for federal office (U.S. House, Senate, and President) was unconstitutional. The ruling will not increase the current $2,600 limit on how much a donor can give to a federal candidate in each primary and general election or the $32,400 limit that can go to a national party committee. Those limits are still in place.  The ruling will instead remove the limit on how many candidates/committees to which a donor can contribute.

    April 9, 2014

Special Deals
The Duncan Banner on Facebook
AP Video

Who do you favor for the U.S. Senate seat that Tom Coburn is giving up?

State Rep. T.W. Shannon, R-Lawton
U.S. Rep. James Lankford, R-Edmond
State Sen. Connie Johnson, D-Oklahoma City
Former State Sen. Randy Brogdon, R-Owasso
     View Results