The Duncan Banner


January 25, 2014

Buzz misfired in Vanity Fair body slam of Duncan

DUNCAN — As the new kid in town, I’m reluctant to leap atop the ramparts to defend the honor of Duncan, Okla., my new adopted hometown.

But to heck with that. When an out-of-towner comes into your house and soils your rug, it’s on.

I speak, of course, about the article in Vanity Fair magazine about Duncan and the  killing last year of Chris Lane, the Australian who was gunned down in August.

The author of the article, the estimable Buzz Bissinger of  “Friday Night Lights fame,” put together a compelling article about the events that preceded the slaying.

He is indeed a wordsmith, and he likes high school football, too, so he’s probably an alright guy in many ways.

But he erred when he removed his reporter’s fedora and replaced it with the headwear of a social scientist (no idea what sort of hat that would be, but it could resemble a court jester’s chapeau.)

Reporters do that sometimes.  They want answers to the all-important question of Why?

This is how it goes.

The reporter blows into town, typically a place  he’s never seen before, where a tragedy  has  occurred. Facts, opinions and observations are scribbled down.

If it’s a small town in, say, Oklahoma, the townsfolks usually are friendly and willing to help an out-of-towner.  Some of them, if the reporter is lucky, feel the need to talk, in a therapeutic sense. This is good for the writer because he needs  answers on why the terrible tragedy has shattered the peace and serenity of the quiet small town where church bells ring on Sunday and flags fly on the Fourth of July.

As it turns out,  in the mind of Buzz Bissinger, the killing of the innocent Australian was caused in part by the City of Duncan, Okla.

The town is “souless,” the gap between the “haves” and “have nots” is too wide, racial intolerance has bred hopelessness and anger in the teenage boy suspects, and dangit, there’s just not enough for the young folk to do in the one-horse town!

Why, just count the number of corporate-owned eateries that are strung along the highway that cuts though the town, Bissinger observes,  and the sheer number of churches in a city the size of Duncan is far beyond the pale for any right-minded person.

The local reaction to Bissinger’s article has been predictable, but the most cogent observation was offered  by  Lauren Ellis, executive director of the United Way of Stephens County, who reminded us it was “a media piece, for entertainment ...”

Translation: what’s in the magazine ain’t necessarily so.

Maybe, just maybe, every town in America, and perhaps the world, has “the other side of the tracks” somewhere in its midst.

And could it be there are racists in every town from Timbuktu to Portland, Maine — or Portland, Ore., for that matter?

You think?

If you really want to see young people living in abject, hopeless poverty, go overseas and  visit a Third World country.

Those are the kids who deserve a little sympathy and compassion for their lot in life. If the young folk in this town, this state or this country who say they bored and that life is just too unfair  could do that, they’d thank their lucky stars they live in America — or Duncan, Okla.

(Olafson is the news editor of The Banner. His email is and you can find him on Twitter @Steve_Olafson)

Text Only
Local News
  • Governor, state Legislature have misplaced priorities

    If the Oklahoma State Legislators and our Governor spent less time interfering in women’s rights to manage their bodies, creating ways to lay more taxes and fees on the middle class in order to generate more tax breaks which benefit only the wealthy while also conceiving methods with which to fill Oklahoma’s for-profit prisons, they would be doing all of us a favor. Instead, why not work to enhance funding for our schools and wage increases for all school employees? While reforming the state’s educational budget, why don’t they approve wage increases for our Oklahoma State Troopers and enlarge their Academy to insure qualified individuals are ready to fill the upcoming vacancies as many of the older force retire?

    April 9, 2014

  • Self government key to keeping politicians in check

    Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that federal campaign laws that limit the total amount of money donors can give to political parties, committees and candidates for federal office (U.S. House, Senate, and President) was unconstitutional. The ruling will not increase the current $2,600 limit on how much a donor can give to a federal candidate in each primary and general election or the $32,400 limit that can go to a national party committee. Those limits are still in place.  The ruling will instead remove the limit on how many candidates/committees to which a donor can contribute.

    April 9, 2014

Special Deals
The Duncan Banner on Facebook
AP Video

Who do you favor for the U.S. Senate seat that Tom Coburn is giving up?

State Rep. T.W. Shannon, R-Lawton
U.S. Rep. James Lankford, R-Edmond
State Sen. Connie Johnson, D-Oklahoma City
Former State Sen. Randy Brogdon, R-Owasso
     View Results