The Duncan Banner


December 9, 2012

Surely we can survive mudslinging — can’t we?

DUNCAN — Got into an email conversation a few days ago with a woman whose hobby is politics. She mentioned being “very pleased the November election cycle is over, because I couldn’t stand listening to anymore of the mudslinging.”

Ah, mudslinging and attack ads ... the Great American Political Pastime.

Although candidates refer to one another as “my worthy opponent,” individuals and groups who support a candidate spend big bucks on ads, mailouts and electronic postings that proclaim a candidate’s opponent is not only “unworthy,” he or she is a fascist, communist, spouse abuser, devil worshiper, draft-dodger, corporate shill and on and on.

The media runs surveys showing six or seven out of 10 Americans are offended by mudslinging attack ads, and they pray nightly that incivility in political campaigns will just go away. Thing is: I don’t believe it.

I’m not swallowing the surveys, not buying into the notion a majority of American voters yearn for civility in our elections.

Do we really want a kinder, gentler political playing field? Or do most Americans simply give lip service to that notion?

I’m inclined to think it’s the latter, for two reasons:

1. If we’re so turned off by attack ads, why do supporters of candidates continue to spend mega-bucks on negative campaign advertising?

2. This nation has a long and apparently revered history of mudslinging that dates back to our very first elections.

That’s right, the concept of negative campaigning didn’t just creep up with the notorious “Daisy Ad” Lyndon Johnson’s supporters used so effectively against Barry Goldwater in 1960. Supporters of George Herbert Walker Bush weren’t innovators when they linked Michael Dukakis to Willie Horton in 1988.

Over the generations, George Washington has taken on diety-like status in American history. But as the Continental Congress debated reelecting ol’ George in 1792, some newspapers portrayed him as a scoundrel, because his wife had been previously married. Down at the taverns, rogues questioned the virility of the man who would become the “Father of Our Country,” because Washington hadn’t fathered children of his own.

Our political history is filled with resorting to vulgar taunts.

Our candidates and their minions have merrily slandered one another as thieves, liars, atheists, drunks, crybabies, fornicators, bigamists, cross-dressers, cowards, traitors and dangerous lunatics.

They have likened one another to apes, snakes, pigs and rats, while dodging the serious issues of their age.

Attack ads and smear campaigns are as old as the republic — the Greek Republic, that is. And I suspect if you’d taken a survey in 300 B.C., a majority of ancient Greeks would have proclaimed they wanted to see a return of civility in politics.

But I doubt if they meant it, anymore than we mean it in 21st century America.

See, a lot of times “civility” is defined by political persuasion; one person’s interpretation of a slanderous statement is another person’s definition of the facts coming out. It depends on how you cast your vote, more than the truth or accuracy of the mud being slung.

Plus, there are factors peculiar to this age that make it highly unlikely negative campaigning and attack ads will soon disappear from the political landscape.

Mass communication, instantaneous access to information sources, 24-hour news cycles presenting opinion as fact, bloggers — some with dubious sources — becoming self-proclaimed pundits and rigid partisanship blur the line between fact and fiction.

We have at least two generations of young voters who have a glaring lack of knowledge about our history and how our political system really works.

Then toss fear into the mix — fear of economic collapse, of terrorism, of illegal immigrants, of cultural change, of expanding global conflict, of climate change, of a crumbling infrastructure — and expecting our political process to be civil and dignified is probably too much to ask.

Maybe we just have to live with juvenile attack ads and our fickle reaction to them.

After all, it’s better than the option of choosing our leaders by shooting each other down in the streets.

And, really, far be it from me to suggest we rid ourselves of another grand American tradition.

So I say: Civility be damned! Bring on the mud! We can take it.

Can’t we?

580-255-5354, Ext. 172

Text Only
  • Governor, state Legislature have misplaced priorities

    If the Oklahoma State Legislators and our Governor spent less time interfering in women’s rights to manage their bodies, creating ways to lay more taxes and fees on the middle class in order to generate more tax breaks which benefit only the wealthy while also conceiving methods with which to fill Oklahoma’s for-profit prisons, they would be doing all of us a favor. Instead, why not work to enhance funding for our schools and wage increases for all school employees? While reforming the state’s educational budget, why don’t they approve wage increases for our Oklahoma State Troopers and enlarge their Academy to insure qualified individuals are ready to fill the upcoming vacancies as many of the older force retire?

    April 9, 2014

  • Self government key to keeping politicians in check

    Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that federal campaign laws that limit the total amount of money donors can give to political parties, committees and candidates for federal office (U.S. House, Senate, and President) was unconstitutional. The ruling will not increase the current $2,600 limit on how much a donor can give to a federal candidate in each primary and general election or the $32,400 limit that can go to a national party committee. Those limits are still in place.  The ruling will instead remove the limit on how many candidates/committees to which a donor can contribute.

    April 9, 2014

  • Legislative goals crucial to priorities in education

    I am a member of several professional organizations where I attend regular meetings, network with colleagues, and stay abreast and informed on education best practices.  The Cooperative Council for Oklahoma School Administration, better known as CCOSA, is a nonprofit organization that establishes close and continuous communication and cooperation between educators, taxpayers, and legislators to improve the effectiveness of professional school administrators and to communicate the needs of schools. Attendance this time of year is especially critical because legislators are in session.

    March 28, 2014

  • An impressive ranking that could be better

    That Duncan was named one of the best 15 communities in Oklahoma by Movoto, a national Real Estate company, is news worth celebrating.
    Of 43 places with population of 10,000 or more, as determined by the U.S. Census data, Duncan finished 15th. Norman was first, Edmond second, Yukon and Moore tied for third and Bethany was fifth.

    March 9, 2014

  • Kids shouldn’t have to pay for having punster parents

    Friends and neighbors, I’ve been cloistered in my Thought Chamber for the past few days, contemplating many high-brow philosophies and haughty hypothesis that we who think on a different level use to exercise our finely-tuned minds and remain intellectually superior to the Great Unwashed.
    As you see, the time alone has been intellectually beneficial. I just composed an opening sentence (what we in the journalism dodge call a “lead”) that’s 46 words long.

    March 9, 2014

  • The blissful serenity of No-TV Land

    Life without TV is possible. Maybe you should try it. I did. It’s a do-able thing, I tell you. I’m still here, no worse the wear, no oozing wounds, no serious loss of brainwave activity except for the slow, inexorable downhill decline that already started when TV viewing was a daily occurrence.

    Granted, two months without the tube is quite likely not a scientifically acceptable sample from which is to hold forth. But it’s the best I can do, so deal with it.

    March 9, 2014

  • Cooper’s message is to remain active

    Dr. Kenneth Cooper, the Dallas physician who coined the phrase “aerobics” more than four decades ago, who has become a world leader in physical fitness and who has saved, literally, thousands of lives by promoting the value of an active lifestyle, shared his philosophy of life here last week.

    March 9, 2014

  • Time to take the “B” out of the “Three R’s”

    Our young folks are hitting the stretch drive toward the end of another school year, during which they’ve been taught “Three R’s”, which are not really “r’s” at all.
    In case you missed it, reading is the only one of the “Three R’s” that actually begins with the letter “r.” Writing starts with a “w” and arithmetic begins with the letter “a.” There are two reasons we drop the “w” from “writing” and the “a” from “arithmetic”: 1. For poetic flow in the age-old saying; and, 2. many people have a secret yen to talk like the Beverly Hillbillies.

    February 23, 2014

  • Thank you for lettin’ me be myself again

    Friends and neighbors, hope I don’t sound like the biggest egomaniac since Donald Trump, but you know, I am the most interesting person I’ve ever known.
    Forgive me if — on first blush — that sounds like the most totally self-aggrandizing statement you’ve ever heard. And if you’ve headed to the restroom to express an editorial opinion about the statement above, I’ll stop for a couple minutes.

    February 15, 2014

  • Buzz misfired in Vanity Fair body slam of Duncan

    As the new kid in town, I’m reluctant to leap atop the ramparts to defend the honor of Duncan, Okla., my new adopted hometown.
    But to heck with that. When an out-of-towner comes into your house and soils your rug, it’s on.
    I speak, of course, about the article in Vanity Fair magazine about Duncan and the  killing last year of Chris Lane, the Australian who was gunned down in August.

    January 24, 2014